The work you retype, reformat and re-enter? A workflow should do it.
Small, reliable automations that take over the repetitive jobs between your systems.
Small, reliable automations that take over the repetitive jobs between your systems.
We start with the chore that eats the most hours: data entry, document handling, follow-ups, reporting.
The workflow runs on tools you own, with human checkpoints wherever judgment matters. You approve what it can do.
We count the time it saves. If it earns its keep, we pick the next one. One workflow at a time.
one-time build on tools you own. Bigger multi-system workflows are scoped from the assessment.
Not sure which end of the range you'd land on? Start with the assessment: it answers that with a guarantee.
The repetitive kind: moving data between systems, pulling information out of documents, sending follow-ups, assembling reports, chasing signatures. If it's the same steps every time, it's a candidate.
Workflows fail safe: when something unexpected happens they stop and tell a human instead of guessing. And I monitor them.
Usually not. Workflows run on and between the tools you already own, on an automation layer you own too. No lock-in.
I'm Chris Patten: 18 years as a CIO, an accountant by background, grew a company from $1M to $69M, built a platform that did $110M+, and built and sold my own business. You work with me directly, and I have no software to sell you.
You talk, I listen, and I tell you honestly whether I can help, including "you don't need me for this." If we go further, the assessment is guaranteed and credited against your first project.